Best new old furniture store in the world has opened in Williamsburg! Gorgeous repurposed industrial furniture paired with select modern pieces.
www.strawserandsmith.com
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Strawser & Smith
Posted by
rebekah
at
11:10 PM
0
comments
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
I have what you need.
I don't understand.
Feeling adven- turous, I clicked on an ad at nymag.com. (I was looking a business up, okay?) It was for a furniture and accessories store I hadn't heard of...or had forgotten from another life. This purveyor of fine furniture has some of the most amazing traditional fake old fancy tchatkes (for the modern day Marie Antoinette?) I have ever, ever seen. And I have been to an awful lot of furniture show rooms in my time. Really spectacularly tacky, expensive objects like this. And this. And this! One part of me wants to buy it all, bad! It is such a relief from the spare cold modernism we are told is the only expression of "contemporary" living. But then again, isn't Horchow just weird worthless furniture for rich republicans?
I can get my head around the appeal of thousands of glinting crystals, and gilded milled bed posts as thick as your thigh--but the image above represents something much more mysterious; it an object whose capital, value, and purpose I do not begin to understand. The values that the bed, light, etc. are designed to convey, however grotesque and ornate and desperate they seems, are obvious. Tradition, wealth, conservative ideals, "I'm an old lady": all these sentiments are clearly communicated. What's more, those pieces have some sort of utility.
But what is that a pair of in the picture? Why, it's a "Parisian Dormer Window Frame."
Parisian lucarne (dormer window) frame is made of metal with a worn matte patina. Frame has small gaps and spaces between seams due to age and weathering. Sold individually. Measures 18.75"W x 13"D x 35"T. Made in France. Sold individually, originally $3,100.00, now $2,479.90
Was it aged and weathered in France, perhaps on a building for 300 years? Or was it aged and weathered in a shipping yard in France for 6 months after being fabricated in Malaysia? Did it ever hold glass? Can it still? Is it an indoor or outdoor decoration? Most importantly, what will the girls in your bridge club think when you slap this rusted piece of shit on your wall? I guess you're supposed to keep the price tag on and in prominent view.
Posted by
rebekah
at
3:42 PM
0
comments
Labels: old ladies, ornament, rococo, symbiotics
Friday, April 11, 2008
Problematic Abstraction
A new show at the New Museum featuring small works by Tomma Abts looks very intriguing. While I have not yet seen the show (but will and soon), the images of the works I have seen (at the New Museum's website and on nytimes.com) show Ms. Abts' interest to lie in representing three-dimensional spaces and hinting at photographic techniques (see elaborate use of "focus" at left). Strangely, the New Museum and the New York Times articles both laud the artist as a true abstractionist and assert that her paintings could be indistinguishable from work made in the 50's or 60's.
Are they bonkers? Though the earlier works in the show are more purely abstract (yet could never be confused with work from the mid-20th century), as the works progress they reference depth via shadow, color and focus in more and more direct ways. Which makes me wonder: what is abstraction exactly? I thought I knew but now I don't. Are illusionistic paintings of three dimensional situations abstract if they depict objects in space like paper cut-outs? Or is abstraction merely a lack of people, places and things, and unrelated to depicting spacial relationships?
Posted by
rebekah
at
12:30 PM
0
comments
Labels: abstraction, art, painting
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
De(con)struction

The crane collapse on the upper east side this past weekend was morbidly spectacular. I had my fill of gawking on a lunchtime walk past the site. The rescue workers had quite an audience of appreciative, slack-jawed onlookers.
The following morning, my commute through Grand Central was interrupted by red tape barring my usual route through the station. Behind the red tape a group of men was standing and kneeling around a still (lifeless?) body on a stretcher. They had clearly been there for some time. One man was administering defibrillation to the body. They had taken the dead man's shoes off. Is that protocol? In any case, all I remember is the scene illustrated below quite clearly. Lots of people had gathered to gawk but I hurried past. I felt for the guy, thought about him and his death, but I didn't feel that stopping and staring was appropriate.
Posted by
rebekah
at
10:02 AM
0
comments
Labels: construction, death, old men
Thursday, March 13, 2008
The Fold, presented not by Deleuze but by the Cooper Hewitt
I am really looking forward to seeing this exhibit at the Cooper Hewitt National Design Museum. "Rococo: The Continuuing Curve, 1730-2008" promises to have some breathtaking objects. Make sure you click through to slide #5. It is quite humbling, and thus important, to see objects that are not merely exceptional in our time, but which were standouts in their own time. It makes you remember that people have been fashioning unique and fantastic objects forever, styles and eras be damned.
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Can your imagination tell the difference between a 40 ft and a 50 ft reptile?
Luckily for you and me, dear reader, the Tuesday Science Times has become even more visually enticing. The newish Science in Pictures combines an extremely concise format with useless and bizarre information. And pretty pretty pictures, which was the only part I liked anyway. A fun picture or illustration is matched with a title, and an explanatory paragraph of two to four sentences. But don't worry; there is still plenty of room for fun!
Here are my two favorite tidbits.
I have actually devoted a significant amount of time-um, let's say minutes--wondering about the origins of domesticated farm animals, notably sheep and cows. But I had not yet given any thought to chickens. Luckily, the Times always anticipates my burning intellectual desires. So, Darwin believed modern chicken to be descended from red jungle fowl. Boy, is the joke on him. Turns out, chickens are descended from gray jungle fowl AS WELL as red jungle fowl. What on earth is a jungle fowl? Is it a specific species? Or just a genus? Could I have a pet jungle fowl? Would it (either color) get along with my jungle reptile? Goddammit, they always leave me wanting more...
In other earth shattering discoveries, a ferocious Jurassic reptile previously believed to have reached lengths of 40 feet is now thought to perhaps maybe one time a billion years ago to have reached lengths of 50 feet. And inspired the most awesome illustration ever! One question: How big is that sea gull?
Posted by
rebekah
at
10:31 AM
0
comments
Tuesday, March 4, 2008
Amazon has me all figured out. Can it help me figure me out?
All Categories Arts & Photography Astronomy Classics Composers & Musicians Contemporary Art Criticism Culture Drawing Electronica Ethnic Studies European Geography German History History of Science Indie & Lo Fi Lo-Fi Modern Music Nonfiction Philosophy Renaissance Rock Social History Urban
During a recent visit to my "personalized" amazon home page, I was startled by its new format. In addition to suggestions, the new style presents a list of categories culled from past purchases with the font size adjusted for relevance! (I assume that it is frequency of purchase from each category that determines relevancy.)
This page could be a useful tool for self-reflection. One could mine their personalized amazon page for cheap psychological advice, or better yet, career counseling. Looks like I should have gone for my Ph.D. in philosophy after all. Damn. Why didn't I have this page senior year of college? Oh yeah, I was too busy studying philosophy to conduct elaborate shopping sprees on Amazon.
Perhaps instead of allowing participants on social networking sites to choose their own likes, influences, etc., one should have the option of submitting an objective summary, courtesy of Amazon.
However, there are a couple of flaws in this system. For instance, these categories are presented as equal concepts when they are actually wildly irrelevant types of classification. Surely, inserting Lo-Fi and History into the same hierarchy can be done by an algorithm but makes no sense to a human being. Second, the above list of my favorite categories includes Ethnic Studies; this can only have been included due to a purchase of textbooks I made for a friend. Also, every time I log on Amazon tries to sell me pastel ruffled baby socks, similar to a set that I purchased once for an acquaintance's baby shower. I feel like these items have nothing to do with me. And yet it is a true and unavoidable fact that I purchased them through Amazon. And so they must!
Posted by
rebekah
at
10:24 AM
1 comments
Labels: amazon, categories, self-reflection
